 | | Orientation of single train buffers
|
|
I am about to create the single train buffers into LDraw. What orientation shall I use, e.g. where to put the buffer: * -X (left) * +X (right) * -Z (front) * +Z (rear) I thought about putting the origin between the two studs. Niels (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigned Intermodal Car
|
|
(...) No, you are absolutely correct-- I forgot to put them on! I had taken pictures of the car and after posting them on Brickshelf, I noticed that 1 ladder was missing-- so I reshot them. Then I noticed the handbrakes... I didn't have the heart to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigned Intermodal Car
|
|
Rarely do I post comments, good or bad, about people's MOCs, but this is a really great design. However, after working for the RR and climbing up and down on this type of car for years I have to notice that I didn't see any handbrake wheels on it. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigned Intermodal Car
|
|
(...) Thanks, Bill! Ahh. I forgot to list the lowlites;-) Due to the nice, low profile, the sides scrape the power leads. I need to shave them (the leads, that is) down in order for it to clear. Due to the semi-shrouded truck design (which is (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigned Intermodal Car
|
|
(...) J-2, Really nice! Questions: How does it make handle around curves and through switches? How tall is it with 2 containers stacked (is it less than 16 studs high?) Hope to see it irl when my work schedule allows me to make it to club :) -- Bill (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Redesigned Intermodal Car
|
|
(...) Whoops! Try (URL) HERE> instead! JOHN (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Redesigned Intermodal Car
|
|
Hello train enthusiasts- I have posted some new pics of my redesigned Gunderson Maxi-Stack III intermodal container car (URL) HERE> (URL) Highlights include: low design bracing (don't ask about the geometry; it was all trial and error) containers (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | link labels
|
|
(...) Nope, you didn't do anything bad -- your links were beautiful. :-) (...) It's conceivable that there might be a really poorly written miscreant newsreader/e-mail client in existence out there somewhere that get confused and think that the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | link labels
|
|
(...) Chris, :) Not to be picky, but actually, all of the URLs that Steve gave are perfectly valid and legal URLs. (...) His URLs don't contain spaces. The spaces you see are legal terminators of the URL, and the stuff after the space could be (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) That would be going to the wide-side then!!! SteveH (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) lol His malapropism was probably some subconscious 8wide slur:-) JOHN (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) Good Laud! That's raily funny. JOHN (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) Cool! It's a lot better than a censor! (...) Couldn't agree more. SteveH (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) We all know I need an editor! These discussions are what we hoped for. The worst casse would have been deaf ears! It helps us better communicate the goals and intensions for ILTCO. If ILTCO does not stand for, support, and properly represent (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) Man, I need more caffeine. I thought that first sentence was "Your aims as stated are very laughable"... Don't go there! *grin* JohnG, GMLTC fut john.is.a.geek... ;-) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) OK, I that's understodd - I just thought this needed to be clearer. On an earlier point you mentioned "descent" (I presume you don't mean I've gone to the dark side!!!). I meant to promote discussion rather than express dissent. SteveH (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) lugnet.trains is and will continue to be the discussion resource for world wide communication for LEGO train heads! ILTCO has no aspirations to be that and we have communicated our non-intensions to Todd specifically on this topic. The ILTCO (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) (disclaimer: I'm not on the ILTCO organizing committee) I don't think lugnet.trains is any more that gathering place than people make it, and I fully support ILTCO in their goal of becoming a resource and communication medium for LEGO train (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) All in all these hopes and aspirations sound great and I for one am keen to see it work. As a further point how do you intend to delineate between what happens on Lugnet/trains say and what happens on ILTCO? After all Lugnet/trains is the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Individual Membership enrollment now open
|
|
(...) Good morning, Sunshine! JOHN (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
