Subject:
|
Re: height standards... ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Apr 2003 07:26:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
599 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Gak! I don't think there are any decided 'standards' out there yet, nor even
any 'recommended practices', but looking at the image, a full 9 bricks is far
too high for a hi-cube car. I've seen plenty of hi-cube boxcars, both auto
parts and newsprint, and while they're taller, they're not _that much_ taller.
8 bricks vs. the 7 ought to do just fine at that width. Maybe add a plate if it
still 'feels' short.
JG's right though, the "feel" is the thing, so go with what works for you.
Cheers,
KevinM.
In lugnet.trains, Thomas Burger writes:
>
> > Huh? I'm confused. I assume you mean for rolling stock? 6-wide or 8-wide
> > scale? Or do you mean clearance for overpasses?
>
> here is a image that can best explain my question
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/GrapeApe/trains/height.jpg
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread: ![height standards... ? -Thomas Burger (11-Apr-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: height standards... ? -Tim Courtney (11-Apr-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: height standards... ? -Thomas Burger (11-Apr-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: height standards... ? -John Gerlach (11-Apr-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: height standards... ? -Christopher Masi (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: height standards... ? -Thomas Burger (15-Apr-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|