To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 19759
19758  |  19760
Subject: 
Re: height standards... ?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 12 Apr 2003 07:26:06 GMT
Viewed: 
709 times
  
Gak! I don't think there are any decided 'standards' out there yet, nor even
any 'recommended practices', but looking at the image, a full 9 bricks is far
too high for a hi-cube car. I've seen plenty of hi-cube boxcars, both auto
parts and newsprint, and while they're taller, they're not _that much_ taller.
8 bricks vs. the 7 ought to do just fine at that width. Maybe add a plate if it
still 'feels' short.
JG's right though, the "feel" is the thing, so go with what works for you.
Cheers,
KevinM.

In lugnet.trains, Thomas Burger writes:

Huh? I'm confused. I assume you mean for rolling stock? 6-wide or 8-wide
scale? Or do you mean clearance for overpasses?

here is a image that can best explain my question

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/GrapeApe/trains/height.jpg



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: height standards... ?
 
(...) here is a image that can best explain my question (URL) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR