Subject:
|
Re: Truck Trivia (was Re: Small new train web site
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:05:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1518 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> The tiles in question run horizontally, but I totally agree that you
> need at least two studs if you're going vertical. My hopper uses two,
> both using the 1.2l halfpin/studs that Steve B. used. But your idea of
> side mounting a 1x1 with side stud is excellent and allows for the studs
> to be more closely spaced.
I found this out when I needed to put a clear and a trans-yel.
1x1 plate mounted on a 1x2 plate as vertical front turn signals/parking
lights on the sculpted front fenders of a car, and this was the only
way to keep this light assembly from rotating without having it
mounted deeper in the fender. (OTOH, any odd-length brick/plate
mounted vertically with its bottom end on an upright side-stud-1x1
will have its top flush with a plate boundary.)(all of which
can be seen on a rather clumsy Chrysler-Atlantic-ish 'retro'
car, with odd-looking gull-wing doors, currently at the
Construction Site expo together with a great dragon made by
my daughter, and thus probably on their website in a month or so.)
-gbr
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Truck Trivia (was Re: Small new train web site
|
| (...) The tiles in question run horizontally, but I totally agree that you need at least two studs if you're going vertical. My hopper uses two, both using the 1.2l halfpin/studs that Steve B. used. But your idea of side mounting a 1x1 with side (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
