Subject:
|
Re: 10017 Mini-Hopper
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:55:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
669 times
|
| |
|
|
Interesting, I came up with a similar design last year,
http://www.jumare.freeserve.co.uk/lego/trains/5085_main.html
mine is literally half of 10017.
Mark
"Harvey Henkelman" <Ferroequus@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:H83nMp.Mr2@lugnet.com...
> Due to the small size of my living arrangment, my goal is to include • only
> four-wheeled waggons on my layout. Unable to give up the beautiful • 10017
> hopper, I shrunk the design to the two-axle version seen here...
>
> http://community.webtv.net/Ferroequus/GoodsWaggons
>
> ...it keeps the exact same opening mechanism as the full-size set, but • in
> half the space.
>
> Comments are welcome,
>
> -Harvey
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: 10017 Mini-Hopper
|
| (...) Your trains are colorful and excellently rendered. Who says 'bigger is better' is best? I like strings of smaller waggons as they have more of a dramatic effect. Don't let the building stop now, -Harvey (21 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: 10017 Mini-Hopper
|
| (...) Very nice, Harvey and Mark. I must agree that bigger is never necessarily better. Although it's nice to see a long line of rolling stock on a track, I personally prefer cars that are 16 studs or less. This allows to make fixed axle cars, and (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 10017 Mini-Hopper
|
| Due to the small size of my living arrangment, my goal is to include only four-wheeled waggons on my layout. Unable to give up the beautiful 10017 hopper, I shrunk the design to the two-axle version seen here... (URL) keeps the exact same opening (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
