 | | Re: Shay #5 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I think you meant 36", as 30" would be On2-1/2... (and is, I believe, what use of N gauge track in HO scale is called, HOn2-1/2) see: (URL) for more info on HOn2 1/2 or HOn30 as it it sometimes called) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Shay #5 —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Nope. See: (URL) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shay #5 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) while we're nitpicking, c /pouring/poring/ (1) (...) You need to read what you cite more carefully before you decide you should cite from it, because it pretty clearly says that what was once known as On2-1/2, and is NOW On30 is 30". Hence (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shay #5 —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Ah, well, you lost me. I never said anything about 36"; the "3" in On3 is short for 30"... Actually, I was shooting from the hip in my initial post-- I just found that link after your post-- weren't you blathering something about HOn3? :-) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shay #5 —Jeff Christner
|
| | | | | (...) I thought that when numbers like this were used for narrow gauge they were in reference to the gauge of the rails in feet? As in On3 for 3 feet or 36" gauge while On2&1/2 was two and a half feet or 30" gauge. I've also heard of On2, but never (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) No, John. If you'd pay attention you'd learn something. The 3 means 3 FEET or 36 inches. NOT 30. This would be the third or fourth time you've been told that, and not just by me either (Jeff C is exactly correct). (...) And subsequent ones... (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5 —John Neal
|
| | | | | In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Okay, okay. I was wrong thinking 0n3 meant 30" (dropping the "0"), but what fouled me up was your initial incorrect correction: Me: sort of like the popular scale On3, where you'd model in O scale (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5 —James Powell
|
| | | | | | | G uses O, O uses HO, and HO uses N, (...) gauge). G uses what? G in this context is of metre gauge anyway...gauge 1 uses O (SM32), but not for 3' gauge. G is #3 scale, on #1 scale track (or 1/2" to the foot on 1.75" gauge...)-at least, that is what (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5 —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well, yes, saying merely "G" certainly opens up a can of worms since, as you mentioned, many scales utilize gauge 1 track. Scaling at 1:24 would simulate 30" I believe. But your point illustrates that, while there is much precision among some (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Noted and apology accepted. However for ME to know what you're talking about, it's first required for YOU to know what you're talking about. And that's a leap of faith I am not prepared to take without some supporting evidence. :-) (1) Next (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5 —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) 3 (...) Now I'm nitpicking :-).... there is one good fit for 3 feet, which is TTN3 using the Brit scale for TT of 3mm to the foot: N gauge 9mm track fits perfectly. I used to build Isle of Man Railway to (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
