| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > Hafner has already modelled them -- you should contact him about using them
> > > in the clone elements DB.
> >
> > I wonder--since these parts still have the official LEGO logo on the
> > studs, would they even have a place in a clones DB? You've mentioned
> > previously a possible library of dats based on user-modified elements;
> > perhaps Tony's bricks would fit in that group?
>
> I'm wondering why this leaked over into .trains...
Well obviously it's because I deleted the part that was relevant to trains
before posting it. If you had bothered to read the part I didn't post, it
would all be clear to you.
My train-related question, since Tony's engrooved bricks first appeared in
.trains, was this: how do purists feel about user-modified bricks like
these? I mean, I think they're pretty cool, but I'm hardly a rabid purist.
> I would say that if there are only 2 bins, "official LEGO(r) parts", and
> "everything else" these parts belong in the "everything else" bin.
And here you nicely answered my un-asked question. Hmm... Maybe you *did*
read the bit that I didn't post.
> But the better solution is a different bin (library) for user modified
> parts.
I harbor a suspicion that you're a closet clone-fan. There. I said it.
Dave!
X-posted to Trains for some sense of closure,
but FUT only to OT.Clones
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
