Subject:
|
Re: The philosophy of manual uncoupling
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 May 2002 22:26:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1274 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Jonathan Reynolds wrote:
> Encouraging words, Christopher.
>
> Did it actually work (magnets are quite strong!)? How did you provide power?
Yes, it worked quite well. I remember that it is best to have the
plunger hit the base of the car just above the magnet to work reliably
(also works with the widest diversity of cars). I think all of my test
were "bench tests" so I was using a 9v transformer to power the motor.
-chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: The philosophy of manual uncoupling
|
| (...) Encouraging words, Christopher. Did it actually work (magnets are quite strong!)? How did you provide power? 8w would of course make it easier to conceal within the loco body but I still think the only real benefit would be with remote or (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
6 Messages in This Thread: ![The philosophy of manual uncoupling -Rick Clark (3-May-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: The philosophy of manual uncoupling -Jonathan Reynolds (3-May-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: The philosophy of manual uncoupling -Christopher Tracey (4-May-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: The philosophy of manual uncoupling -Jonathan Reynolds (4-May-02 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: The philosophy of manual uncoupling -Sebastian Dyson (5-Feb-08 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|