To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 15587
  Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
 
(...) Neither do I. I didn't suggest it was wrong, only that I was curious why some folks like to keep sets unopened. It's a really hard concept for me to get my little brain around. :) (...) 100% for me, but then who's counting? (...) I suppose (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
 
(...) I hear you say that and see that now. But when I read your original (requoting) (...) I seriously took your words to mean "this is wrong". The "may sound a bit snotty" is often a giveaway to that sort of "wrongness" sentiment. Had you said "I (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
 
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> c /Scroedinger's/Schroedinger's/ (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
 
(...) Different interpretations of what it means to 'be snotty' I guess. I see snotty as taunting, presumptuous, know-it-all. I was trying to preface my comments (which *could* have sounded snotty) and let people know that I wasn't just flinging out (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
 
(...) After I checked both dictionaries by my computer and then hiked down to the basement to the OED, all without results, I looked up "festouche" on Google-- now THAT certainly calls to mind an image. (...) So Lar, you have one listed in the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
 
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GsHAKM.F9w@lugnet.com... (...) participating (...) "collecting Lego" (...) to (...) [ ... snipped ... ] Four years ago when I first re-discovered this hobby the thought of not (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Trains sets are just not meant to be parted out... (was re parting/collectability was SF F unit set
 
(...) You ask this question in .trains ??? Infidel. The answer is obvious. Go to the wasteland that is .starwars and repent. :-) (although at one dark point pre BrickLink(bay) I was contemplating raiding a built 4551 for its red corros... ) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR