 | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | <snipping most of the article, sorry allan> I guess you are right in what you are saying about lego being a participating hobby. However. I really don't think there is anything wrong with "collecting Lego" so I do have several unopened sets...but (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) Neither do I. I didn't suggest it was wrong, only that I was curious why some folks like to keep sets unopened. It's a really hard concept for me to get my little brain around. :) (...) 100% for me, but then who's counting? (...) I suppose (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I hear you say that and see that now. But when I read your original (requoting) (...) I seriously took your words to mean "this is wrong". The "may sound a bit snotty" is often a giveaway to that sort of "wrongness" sentiment. Had you said "I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> c /Scroedinger's/Schroedinger's/ (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | | | (...) Different interpretations of what it means to 'be snotty' I guess. I see snotty as taunting, presumptuous, know-it-all. I was trying to preface my comments (which *could* have sounded snotty) and let people know that I wasn't just flinging out (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | (...) After I checked both dictionaries by my computer and then hiked down to the basement to the OED, all without results, I looked up "festouche" on Google-- now THAT certainly calls to mind an image. (...) So Lar, you have one listed in the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | "Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GsHAKM.F9w@lugnet.com... (...) participating (...) "collecting Lego" (...) to (...) [ ... snipped ... ] Four years ago when I first re-discovered this hobby the thought of not (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Trains sets are just not meant to be parted out... (was re parting/collectability was SF F unit set —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) You ask this question in .trains ??? Infidel. The answer is obvious. Go to the wasteland that is .starwars and repent. :-) (although at one dark point pre BrickLink(bay) I was contemplating raiding a built 4551 for its red corros... ) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
