 | | Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
|
(...) Sounds good. (...) Maybe just a comment field... one could comment on the intended "fate" of the set when one registers it. If for some reason one felt the need to change it, an email to you?? Hopefully not that high volume of changes. This (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Build Notes on 10020 - Santa Fe Super Chief
|
|
(...) Thanks to the few people who e-mailed me about this. I checked the shipping box again (which holds my unopened set) and lo and behold there were 2 packs of the aforementioned peices in there. I am still disappointed about the windows (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
|
I'm working on an option to allow people that don't know their number to just check an box and not enter anything into the number field. Then they would show at the bottom of the list (the one that is sorted by number of course). As for allowing (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 Registry opinion
|
|
"Rob Hendrix" <rmhendrix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gs2DoJ.27n@lugnet.com... (...) I agee fully. He should be at the bottom. I'd also like to see the status. Where the set is together or in box or permently parted out... Dean (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 10020 Registry opinion
|
|
I'm not complaining because I'm not on top, but I was thinking that: A???? (unopened) Craig Squier 2/23/2002 North Carolina United States should be on the bottom. Sure he could have #5 for all we know, but we don't. He could have #10000. He has his (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
