Subject:
|
Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 01:26:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
634 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi writes:
> John Neal wrote:
> >
> > Josh Baakko wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > a space of 3's good for modern US rolling stock, with the 5 springs (3 on
> > > outside).
> > > Josh
> >
> > Nope. A wheel is 3 studs wide; if you check the measurements on a typical US
> > truck, you will find that the space between the wheels is less than a wheel width
> > wide. And there are 2 springs visible from the side, which can be simulated with a
> > stack of 1x1 rounds...
> >
> > -John
>
> I pretty much use John's spacing scheme. At first I thought I would do
> everything three studs between wheelsets, but later I decided to make the
> wheelsets on my rolling stock two studs apart; it gives a little more space
> between the trucks and makes the models look a bit better. The spacing of the
> wheelsets on my engines is 3 studs to match the spacing between the wheelsets on
> the motor. I have to agree with Josh's counting though; the last time I looked I
> could swear I saw 3 columns of springs (the middle one was recessed slightly).
>
> Chris
Older trucks have 2, newer, 3 (100 trucks have 3). It seems excessive to me
too, but the 1x1 round plates make it look like a 100 ton, or older 70 ton.
I use the 2 studs for older rolling stock that has 70 ton trucks, like my
50' gondola. I have a close up pictureof a 100 ton on a roll of film that
needs to be developed soon.
Josh
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts?
|
| (...) I pretty much use John's spacing scheme. At first I thought I would do everything three studs between wheelsets, but later I decided to make the wheelsets on my rolling stock two studs apart; it gives a little more space between the trucks and (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|