Subject:
|
Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 21:33:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
547 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
>
>
> Josh Baakko wrote:
>
> >
> > a space of 3's good for modern US rolling stock, with the 5 springs (3 on
> > outside).
> > Josh
>
> Nope. A wheel is 3 studs wide; if you check the measurements on a typical US
> truck, you will find that the space between the wheels is less than a wheel width
> wide. And there are 2 springs visible from the side, which can be simulated with a
> stack of 1x1 rounds...
>
> -John
100 ton trucks are the same width between as the wheels are. and there are
3 visible. the ones with 2 springs visible are 70 ton trucks.
;-) can't fool me,
Josh
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts?
|
| Josh and John, I really appreciate you 2 dueling it out over this issue on my account. I'm learning well more than I thought there was to know. Do either of you have a site where I can see pictures of the 2 options? (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts?
|
| (...) Ah, well, I guess I was referring to older, lighter trucks, which probably comprise 95+% of trucks made over the years. But here is something to think about, Josh. Even if a 100 ton truck does measure out to be 3 studs between the wheels, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts?
|
| (...) Nope. A wheel is 3 studs wide; if you check the measurements on a typical US truck, you will find that the space between the wheels is less than a wheel width wide. And there are 2 springs visible from the side, which can be simulated with a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
13 Messages in This Thread: ![Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Justin Pankey (7-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -John Neal (7-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Josh Baakko (7-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -John Neal (7-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Christopher Masi (7-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Josh Baakko (8-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Justin Pankey (7-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Josh Baakko (8-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -John Neal (8-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Josh Baakko (8-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -Rick Clark (12-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question for the true train enthusiasts? -John Neal (18-Aug-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|