Subject:
|
Re: Possible Source of NEW Trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 2 May 1999 00:19:43 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.iwantnospamIHATESPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
1704 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott Edward Sanburn wrote:
>
> Josh,
>
> Thanks, I never saw any around here. Bad quality, huh? Oh well, at
> least it was an attempt. Ugh!
>
> Scott Sanburn
>
> Joshua Delahunty wrote:
> >
> > I've seen (held, checked-out, put back) the military sets in a Target in
> > the San Francisco Bay Area in California.
> >
> > Among other problems, the plates look really flimsy. That, along with
> > other general flimsy appearance meant I wasn't willing to chance the
> > price to find out if they were as bad as they looked from the outside of
> > the package (flip the top, and you can see through the clear plastic
> > windows at bags of pieces).
> >
> > I'd like to be told otherwise, but so far they look like a no-go, at
> > least for me. <shrug>
I felt the same way. I fervently hope they do not make trains unless
they can improve the quality a LOT. Their molds can't be THAT imprecise
so it's got to be the speed at which they eject the parts.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
