 | | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) Which I can attest to. He's clueless. He's been building an 8 stud wide locomotive at the GMLTC(1) meetings 3 weeks in a row now and hasn't progressed much beyond the fuel tanks and frame. Just kidding. John is trying to get it PERFECT. And it (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
It is *I* who is more than a little dazed for not knowing those came in the set! Although I have 6, only one is yet opened and assembled by my kids, so I wasn't even aware of them:^p My apologies to you, Paul:) And I applaud you and all other who (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) Who, me? I have so many gray noses at this point I may actually sell one off!!! (gulp) and I only have two white ones, so it wasn't me, ok? We're TRACKing your insinuations and would prefer not to be RAILROADed through the court of public (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: //WWW.BAYLUG.ORG (weavers)
|
|
(...) Tom Stangl wrote: (...) Well, rather than SPAM the trains and SF list with website/HTML talk, I've created a small mailing list for the webmasters on the BayLUG site If you have comments and suggestions, you can send them to "weavers" at (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) While we're being pedantic, it's not TLG that is wrong, it's the US Lego Shop at Home service that is wrong. S@H may be part of TLG but it is not TLG. S@H (and LEGO Systems Inc of North America) seem to make up their own names for things (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
