 | | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3DD00B28.EB4662...ing.com... (...) Yes, many! Adtranz is a very common supplier, Matra has a VAL 256 at O'Hare, and a 206 at Orly in Paris. A few airports have Otis HOVAIR shuttles, including (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Ed McGlynn" <ejmcglynn@netzero.net> wrote in message news:H5H48q.1MD@lugnet.com... (...) DFW: (...) terminals (...) DFW is geting Adtranz's first Inovia shuttle. It's an updated of their very successful design based on the original Westinghouse (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Thomas' Annie, Claribel; and some Troublesome Trucks
|
|
With the advent of the new "Yoda" brown, a decent color finally exists to model the 2 cars Thomas the Tank Engine always pulls: Annie and Claribel. After scouring Bricklink for dozens of necessary 1x1s and the like (thanks, guys!), I present a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Honey, I shrunk the Chateau!
|
|
When I built my chateau a few years back, it was simply an exercise of love-- bulk bricks had just become available, and the doors to creating larger and more complicated and detailed MOCs were opened. It, however, became this large labor of love (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: A project idea for someone...
|
|
(...) -you haven't heard the best part of this one (in full size). To get a cow to market, you needed two calfs as well. (that or 2 cows...). The cars had to be reasonably ballanced in order to work. So, your cow went on one side, the two calfs on (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) <snip description> (...) Very nice. I second these comments. 9 to 8 wide: COOL. later, James Mathis (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: A project idea for someone...
|
|
(...) For anyone who is thinking 12v Center (URL) as Pusher, Midline, and as Lead. Go nuts! (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | A project idea for someone...
|
|
Here is an idea for a radical steam train monorail - it could easily be done using a single rail of old 4.5V track or possibly 12V center track: (URL) you will even be modeling real prototypes... -Matt :) ---...--- www.insidethevault.com - (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing. What are the rods or tubes that go from the bodies to the truck centers? Are those somehow connecting with the tilt mechanism, or are they dampeners/stabilizers or ?? (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) That's a beautiful looking train. Very nice detailing. Definitely looking forward to the LDRAW file. Thanks for sharing it. Play well. Tim Strutt (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
Hi all I have put up some pictures of my latest MOC. (URL) is a model of the Swedish high speed train X2000. The original has a tilting mechanism to allow fast running through tight curves, but my model is only suitable for straight Lego track and (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.build) !!
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
(...) They also came with 7720 and 7722 for attachment to the 4.5 volt battery boxes that ran in back of the 4.5 volt engines. Wayne (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
(...) It is a end of 70's/end of blue area thing. It fits under the wagon-bases and the train-plates with motor-cut-out. See for example: (URL) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
(...) It came in a number of early 70's train sets, like 725. Paul (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | train single buffer
|
|
what set is this part (URL) train single buffer from, I was browsing through looking for a uk speed regulator when I found it and I can't find it in any inventories. (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) Thanks for the feedback, James. Like I said, I tried to use as many standard pieces as possible. Besides the regular baseplate, it also uses one of the 4x6 truck plates with the central technic pin, and the front wheels can be adapted pretty (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) running on it! Seriously, tell Ross not to try anything *too* spectacular ... I'm running out of black bricks, plates, and slopes, and I'm not sure I can keep up anymore. Every time he posts a new design, I run off with a dozen different (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Stefan Garcia writes: Thanks for the comments, Stefan. (...) Hmmm, methinks the tender is the Achilles tendon? ;) Actually, I spent very little time on the tender itself, throwing it together in about 90 minutes. All of your (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) I can't wait to see how those pistons work. Lookin' forward to those instructions! Great steamer! I've three suggestions though; a) the tender (IMO) would look better if it were slightly elongated and if the slopeback were given a bit more (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) Shaun, I really like how you used a standard train base plate for the foundation of this steam locomotive model. I love how you disguised this base plate at the piston/cylinders with the hinged panel; dropping it SNOT-wise at a slight angle to (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
Hey Shaun- Good idea, and nice MOC! It is a rare engine indeed that can both look the most detailed it can AND be highly functional as well. I am going to ask Ross to take on your challenge of modifying your design and see what he comes up with-- I (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) I'm glad to have been of service :-) Yes, you rendered it about right according to the instructions I gave. One of these days I'll get around to posting some of my TD doodles on Brickshelf. Maybe even today. --Bill. (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
Hi All, In a massive departure from my usual modus operandi, I finished up my latest project last night; a 4-4-4 steam engine. The uncharted territory (for me at least) comes from the fact that (a) the steam engine is *6-wide*, and (b) it is not (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains) !
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
Now THIS is a very good switching yard (the 'to download' one). Great 'extra' advantage: there are pairs of L en R switches, the way we often have to buy these things! I'm definitely going to build it these days. Keep designing guys! I love this (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) Have a boo at my take on Bill's switching yard: (URL) did a TD from his instructions, as others here have, and then I modified it a bit so that the switches for the points are not overlapping the ties of adjacent tracks. Both layouts are shown (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) Darn it! Well, it works great in track designer :-) I wish track designer had a way of pointing out that kind of issue. It's a bug!! But the good news is that 2 switches can be replaced by two straights and a switch, you can replace two of the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) Agreed. I have tried it and the part that sticks out for the switch arm will overlap part of the track beside it. Unfortunate, but that's the facts. Keep trying though, and let us know how you make out. Play well. Tim Strutt (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
Sorry to disappoint you, but you can't connect switches like that. There has to be 1 piece of track between the switches, try it in real life, and wheep... Klaas H. Meijaard (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) <snip the very good text-list description> (...) Bill, You got me curious. I couldn't visualize the text description, so I built it up in Track Designer. Thanks for the very good construction description. Here's what I ended up with following (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) It's close enough that TD considers it to be connected, and that's good enough for me. I used it for the yard design I just posted (q.v.) --Bill. (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Switching yards that actually work
|
|
I've been dabbling with track designer, making switching yards. The latest thread on diagonal track layouts has given me some more tricks to get it to actually line up at the beginning and end with 8- or 16-stud intervals. The following issues make (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost a drug...
|
|
(...) I was not moderated due to technical difficulties. But they are there now. (URL) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.monlug, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
This has been an absolutely great thread, just packed with helpful ideas and findings (even some good track designs to get people thinking! Anyone want to volunteer to write up a summation and share it with Cary so it might get into the FAQ? Thanks (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) Does it work perfectly or does it go over in length by at least a half a stud? I couldn't tell from Track Designer. -chris (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: How's this for an idea ...
|
|
PNLTC has done this as well and found that it is a big hit. We've watched families "play" this together as a team effort... they'd spen sometimes an hour at it. We did several flavors of this too at different layouts, I think it started as a (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) Here's some examples of non-standard connections I have played around with. All of these line up in Track Designer: (URL) if these links line-wrap. Folder is here when moderated, with TDL files: (URL) well. Tim Strutt (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) THANK YOU!!! This works perfectly! I just tested it in Track Designer.... --Bill. (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) John is correct; it's 1-13-3 that works. Blame my faulty memory, it's been a bit since I played in TD. (...) The 2-7-2 is close enough that it connects physically very soundly. The offset is roughly 1 stud. Easy enough to cover with slop, with (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4537 and 7722 Train cars for trade
|
|
(...) It is generally held to be, I believe. Posting for sale info isn't explicitly permitted in the header of the .trains group. I know that I'd be interesting in hearing more about your experiences in restoring these sets to their former glory (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 4537 and 7722 Train cars for trade
|
|
Don't know whether this is off-topic.... If interested look here: (URL) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
