To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / *12619 (-10)
  What's this?
 
I am not a fan of trains, and the only train set I have is the space monorail. I was recently at a lego store in Virginia, and I saw in the train section an old box of train track like I've never seen before (the only kind I've seen is the type used (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Final weeks for Nova Township Railroad
 
(...) That would be a shame. If you could contact me offline, I might be able to get hold of space elsewhere to host it... drop me a note. ++Lar (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Kadee® + LEGO® partnership? (was: Re: Final weeks for Nova Township Railroad)
 
(...) The couplers worked great. The only problem was that LEGO train wheels were a little too free rolling, and when shoving cars after uncoupling them they tended to get away from you at times. However, free rolling can be good if someone builds a (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Kadee® + LEGO® partnership? ( was:Re: Final weeks for Nova Township Railroad)
 
(...) I would very much welcome LEGO compatible Kadee couplers. I would be less interested in trucks, but might give them consideration. There is a real difference. A Kadee coupler would provide tremendous operational enhancement and replace the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Kadee® + LEGO® partnership? (was: Re: Final weeks for Nova Township Railroad)
 
(...) Cool, Jeff. I was wondering if you would share for everyone in more detail how well using Kadee couplers have worked out for you. What if TLC were to enter into a licensing agreement with Kadee to produce modified couplers for them with (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Double arch suspension bridge
 
(...) Yeah, I was pretty pleased with it! Seeing I first designed it over 20 years ago, and hadn't actually built it before to check the design! But it really needs some beams under the tracks to stiffen the deck a bit - with a heavy train, the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Final weeks for Nova Township Railroad
 
(...) No, I love this site, oh well i'll have to save the pictures... Josh (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: MOC: Double arch suspension bridge
 
(...) Wow! I love your bridge! That's really great. You have done a brilliant job in modelling the arc like it is done. Leg Godt! Ben my few bridge building attempts: (URL) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: need help w. electronic trains from the 60's (set 118 and 138)
 
(...) have (...) one (...) Wrong newsgroup for such a request: try marketplace. , or b) want to know what frequency or what sound is needed to get it (...) works (...) it (...) You might find some more infos on these sets on my pages here: (URL) do (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Final weeks for Nova Township Railroad
 
Thought I'd drop everyone a little warning that most of my site will soon be taken down. This includes the following URL's about my switching layout built on a shelf. (URL) second URL contains all the information on how to make Kadee couplers ("O" (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.trains)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR