Subject:
|
Re: My Wedding Cake Topper
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:26:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
49 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> OK, that's fine. If you're not willing to give links of the form:
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Mango/MyWeddingTopper/wedding04-final.jpg
Let's review what I stated earlier Larry. I did not know HOW to post a deep
link. Now, courtesy of your example, I do. Thanks.
> ...then consider just waiting till the folder is available to everyone (you
> can tell easily, just try to access it while not logged in) before you post
> and announce it. Reduces frustration among the readers.
The frustration was enjoyed mostly by me when I realized that the folder
(which had been cleared prior to me uploading the final pictures) was
unavailable to the public AFTER i sent the announcement.
> Really, that's all Richard was asking for, you didn't need to give him a
> hard time about it. Or me either, for that matter.
I wasn't trying to give either you or Richard a "hard time about it". In my
lack of knowledge, I simply stated to wait til morning since it seemed that the
approval process was running a bit smoother. I think you misinterpreted my
comments to him. It's one of the downsides of posting like this. Kinda reminds
me of the FIDOnet days.
> There is *no* connection between not posting till your folder is available
> (or posting things that ARE available, like deep links, if you're just
> bursting to share the info with everyone soonest! ) and giving Kevin the
> benefit of the doubt.
>
> Both are the polite thing to do but they are completely unrelated.
Read above for related reasons. ^
> Best wishes on your upcoming wedding. It's not too late to come to your
> senses and call the whole thing off, though! :-) I think the third try was
> my favorite... captures my views on marriage nicely.
Thank you for the well wishes. I personally would prefer to avoid a 3rd time
seeing as how this is my 2nd attempt at it. Twice is more than enough when it
comes to having to deal with caterers...DJ's...Photographer's, etc.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Wedding Cake Topper
|
| (...) Whoops! I wasn't talking about weddings, just about the various tries at the topper design... what I was calling the third try was the one with the bride swinging the very large ax and the groom a bit out of his head. :-) That one was my (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Wedding Cake Topper
|
| (...) OK, that's fine. If you're not willing to give links of the form: (URL) is determinable (by you but not by anyone else until your folder is cleared) by clicking on the image shown in this link: (URL) ) ...then consider just waiting till the (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
