Subject:
|
Re: Jr. Town Shame?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 02:47:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
898 times
|
| |
|
|
> 2) Philosophy: If I like Lego, and like some of the Lego town sets, how can
> I toss away their Town scale?
> How do you regard those who depend on Lego sets for their town? For the
> reason mentioned above, and because I like to have as large a town (numbers
> and range wise) as possible, I use a lot of the Town sets, and then add
> homes and other essentials (video stores, bars, etc) that they don't make.
> But the stuff I add is on a Lego scale, which nowadays means a Jr. scale.
> And I guess what I want to know, is that weak? I know building from scratch
> would be better, but I think we all accept that there are some sets that are
> nice, but using them accepts a smaller non-realistic scale. Thoughts?
1) The minifig isn't very much to scale to begin with.
2) Using town-scale doesn't have to involve a sacrifice in detail. See my
(small) website for proof.
Will
Bricksburg Fire and Rescue: www.crosswinds.net/~hokie
Bricksburg Depot: http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?p=willhess
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Jr. Town Shame?
|
| I did not enter my town layout in the building contest, because I felt vaguely embarrassed at it. After a little thought, and after reviewing all the entries, I realized why - I was embarrassed at how "Junior-ized" it is. It's not all Jr., mind you. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.town)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
