 | | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
(...) I have two remaining problems with placing DATs in the same categories as photos. First, you can use any number of rare pieces. Second, you can build things that *attach* like real-world pieces but you aren't limited to building structures (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
Amy: (...) I don't find that a serious problem. The definition of "rare" is anyway strongly dependen't on when you got your LEGO sets, and what kind of sets you were lucky enough to get. (...) I consider that cheating! Play well, Jacob -- "There is (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
(...) I agree. Building in "Real Life" is an additional challenge. One could think of it as "Built Projects" vs. "Project Proposals." I've seen architecture exhibits where the designs were never expected to be built -- they were extreme solutions (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
(...) My next bridge project will have a constraint I want extra credit for: it must hold a real-world cat or two :-) Amy (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
(...) Yeah. To most people a part like, say, the monorail motor cover from the airport shuttle is a rare piece but to someone who has 8 airpirt shuttles it might not be... (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
<snip> (...) I agree with Suz with an additional comment. The "wow" factor of seeing a picture using real bricks is different (not saying better, not saying worse - just "different") than the "wow" factor of seeing a DAT/CAD rendition. Both are (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
|
(...) Or painting vs. sculpture? (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
