To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 8004
8003  |  8005
Subject: 
A better device for tank treads than the adder / subtractor
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 03:49:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1029 times
  
I have a challange for those realy good at using differentials and gears:

The adder / subtractor device is not the ideal device for use in tank
treads.  An ideal device would drive straight forward and back with both
motors running.  It would also be able to turn in place with some
combination of motors running, (maybe one motor or both motors turning in
opposite directions).  It would be good if it allowed partial skid steering,
(both treads turning buy one turning faster than the other).

The above condition may be accomplished by motors directly driving the
treads but with a mechical link to ensure equal turing when both motors are
powered.  The mechanical link would be broken if only one motor were
powered, or if the motors where powered to drive the treads in opposite
dirrections.

Anyone have any ideas?
Roy Nelson



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: A better device for tank treads than the adder / subtractor
 
(...) Well, an adder/subtractor (a/s) *does* turn both treads evenly, but only with one motor driving. (...) An a/s does this when the drive motor is stopped and *the other* motor turns. (...) Controlled by the speed / direction of "turning" motor. (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
  Re: A better device for tank treads than the adder / subtractor
 
(...) I think most of your problems would be solved by installing a clutch that links the left and right drive axles. It would be somewhat like the limited slip differential in the Ferrari brothers book. I perfer using the clutch gear instead of (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
  Re: A better device for tank treads than the adder / subtractor
 
(...) Do you want both motors to contribute to the power when driving straight? I.e., is your worry that one motor is idle, and hence does not contribute to the motion? Is that why you want a different arrangement? As I see it, the main advantage (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR