Subject:
|
Re: `Why Britain needs more Meccano and less Lego'
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:51:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
703 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, John Barnes writes:
> Steven Lane wrote;
>
> > This would be invaluable for people who wish to comment on Lego but do not
> > have the experience we enthusiast's have. It should also address the element
> > of Meccano fans who have a simplistic dislike of Lego.
>
> I wonder what the average age of a typical Meccano fan who dislikes Lego is?
>
> After all, in Meccano's golden age, Lego was just bricks!
>
> If the critic's experience stems from more than 20 years ago, then it is
> the memory
> of what the comparison used to be that is being expressed. And, due to the fact
> that the (unlucky) majority of adults are not AFOLs, they will never get a
> chance
> to discover how far Lego has come, specifically in the area of Technic.
>
> So, IMHO, the current superiority of Lego doesn't require any
> justification. It has
> simply outpaced the competition!
>
> JB
I agree with what John's written although just because we're right doesn't
mean we can't tell them we're right :-). We only need to justify ourselve's
as much as you'd justify yourself supporting any position. Just enough
justification to convince the opposition that we are indeed right.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: `Why Britain needs more Meccano and less Lego'
|
| Steven Lane wrote; >This would be invaluable for people who wish to comment on Lego but do not >have the experience we enthusiast's have. It should also address the element >of Meccano fans who have a simplistic dislike of Lego. I wonder what the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
