Subject:
|
Re: 8263 Snow Groomer Review
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:57:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
23257 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.technic, Jetro de Chateau wrote:
> The excuse about the environment is not a very solid one. Maybe LEGO uses less
> paper and ink, but many people still like to have a physical copy of the
> document and printing a single set on an inkjet printer is more environmentally
> unfriendly that LEGO providing 10.
>
> The cost factor is of course a much more important aspect, but personally I
> prefer paying that little bit extra and having my instruction booklet than
> having to use the computer which makes for a lot less comfortable building.
>
> Jetro
The environment argument gets even thinner when you consider the fact that set
8259 (Mini Bulldozer) has 3 instruction booklets - 2 for the main model, and one
for the alternate model. Considering that this is only about 65 pages worth of
instructions, 3 separate books seems a bit ridiculous. The fact that it's a $10
set in the US further complicates matters.
Great set, though.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: 8263 Snow Groomer Review
|
| (...) Hears the thing. We cut down trees to make paper. Before that might have been a bad thing. BUT things are much more regulated now. Trees are now grown in treefarms specifically to be cut down. I'm sure I read or heard somewhere (you might want (...) (15 years ago, 11-Jul-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 8263 Snow Groomer Review
|
| (...) The excuse about the environment is not a very solid one. Maybe LEGO uses less paper and ink, but many people still like to have a physical copy of the document and printing a single set on an inkjet printer is more environmentally unfriendly (...) (15 years ago, 10-Jul-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|