Subject:
|
Re: A couple of gear questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:11:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
23587 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Santeri Piippo wrote:
> Ah, right, so it is for that... I really have to find out how to measure torque.
> I, though, can't see the "2.5-5.0 Ncm" print on the part but I'll take your word
> for it.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/pehrlich/badParts/clutch.jpg
There you can see the writing, and why the torque over a range. Is a non
constant-clutching like this good or bad? What do people think?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A couple of gear questions
|
| (...) I think it's a non-issue for the most part. The torque isn't really "over a range" - it's different for different clutch gears, but for any *single* clutch gear it's pretty constant. After all, if it has a point at which it starts slipping, it (...) (15 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: A couple of gear questions
|
| (...) For most applications it dosen't really pose a noticeable problem. However this inconsistancey is due to the internal structure and the way in which friction is achived. (URL) the only problem I have with it is that the clutch slips way too (...) (15 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A couple of gear questions
|
| (...) Ah, right, so it is for that... I really have to find out how to measure torque. I, though, can't see the "2.5-5.0 Ncm" print on the part but I'll take your word for it. In lugnet.technic, Timothy P. Smith wrote: (...) I see... well I don't (...) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
