 | | Re: I think it's time for a motor grader! Future 8455?
|
|
Patrick Gardella schrieb: (...) The site has moved: (URL) also: (URL) (17 years ago, 27-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Renault Magnum with stepframe trailer laden with a CAT D7R dozer
|
|
"Dennis Bosman" <dennisbosman@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Jwt6yq.MG0@lugnet.com... Getting the right pieces was one of the most difficult issues but (...) Your work is so very fine. Thanks for sharing it, Bob (17 years ago, 26-Feb-08, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Renault Magnum with stepframe trailer laden with a CAT D7R dozer
|
|
(...) I'm impressed with your attention to detail. Great work! (17 years ago, 25-Feb-08, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Renault Magnum with stepframe trailer laden with a CAT D7R dozer
|
|
Hi all, It has been a while since I finished a new MOC. But the model I've added to my (URL) website> today took me more than two years to build. And it has a different color than the previous ones: oranges. That was also the main reason it took so (...) (17 years ago, 25-Feb-08, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Linear Actuator
|
|
(...) I totally agree. I think their is one simple metal part inside a pneumatic ram, and that's mostly cylindrical. An LA must have it's ram,worm gear,worm gear rack, and maybe(hopefully) a bearing all made of metal. Seems like the usual Lego (...) (17 years ago, 23-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Linear Actuator
|
|
The only way I can see these being cheaper to produce is if they have no matel parts at all which would make them even worse. And yes you would need a means to power them throuh a series of gears and universal joints which I think could be more (...) (17 years ago, 23-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Wish I did. :-) Steve (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Yeah, Steve, those are all mine...That was at BF 06' They are all still together with the exception of the truck mounted one. The superstructure and boom is still together, but I tore apart the "truck" part of it to rebuild in the near (...) (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Oh. My. Goodness!!! That would hurt if it fell on you! Once again the LEGO builders--in whatever theme--never cease to astound me! Nicely done! Dave K (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) That's a lot of cranes. Are they all yours? (...) I know I'd like to know. Steve (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) It worked pretty well for me on this one: (URL) all of these: (URL) have had no problems with the two parts coming apart....If you can tell by this pic, the red and white one is holding up a 8421 almost 8 feet away from the center of (...) (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Thanks, read about it (URL) here>. ROSCO (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Great crane Rosco, shame their's no accompanying text. Steve (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Yes, that is correct. (...) See also (URL) technique> - this allowed me to lift the whole crane base up by the superstructure. ROSCO (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Mine has that. (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technicopedia Update
|
|
I have to say that's an absolutely amazing site! Fascinating stuff, I have it bookmarked and I'm looking forward to the rest of your updates! :-) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) This is correct. Real cranes have roller bearings that are pinned in place that bear the weight and force of the superstructure where it is connected to the base. (...) I am going to use a threaded axle through the center to hold the plates (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | What should happen with the lugnet.robotics.nxt sidebar?
|
|
Hello, LUGNET readers. In case you don't know, I'm the lugnet.robotics.nxt curator. I used to update the NXT section sidebar with [in]frequent regularity, but during the last couple months I've not done anything to it. I get busy and/or don't take (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Linear Actuator
|
|
(...) Obviously with *my* interests, I hope that the linear actuator is not the end of pneumatics. There are still a lot of ideas I've not had a chance to try, but more part type options are great! Kevin (www.kclague.net) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Linear Actuator
|
|
The more I think about the new linear actuator the more applications I think up for it, but I was just wondering is it actually going to be significantly cheaper to make than the pneumatic system? I know you won't need a pump, valve block or pipes, (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
