Subject:
|
Re: Linear Actuator
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:38:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10504 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane wrote:
> The more I think about the new linear actuator the more applications I think up
> for it, but I was just wondering is it actually going to be significantly
> cheaper to make than the pneumatic system?
>
> I know you won't need a pump, valve block or pipes, but surely a pneumatic ram
> was extremely simple with only one moving part? and you'll still need parts to
> get the motion from the control knob to the actuator?
Obviously with *my* interests, I hope that the linear actuator is not the end of
pneumatics. There are still a lot of ideas I've not had a chance to try, but
more part type options are great!
Kevin (www.kclague.net)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Linear Actuator
|
| The only way I can see these being cheaper to produce is if they have no matel parts at all which would make them even worse. And yes you would need a means to power them throuh a series of gears and universal joints which I think could be more (...) (17 years ago, 23-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Linear Actuator
|
| The more I think about the new linear actuator the more applications I think up for it, but I was just wondering is it actually going to be significantly cheaper to make than the pneumatic system? I know you won't need a pump, valve block or pipes, (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
