Subject:
|
Re: Two New GBC Modules..
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:55:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8816 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Jean-Marc Nimal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Kevin McClure wrote:
| |
It’s actually pully wheels. The original idea came from
here, the one I made is longer.
|
Thanks! I knew of that site (which is very great GBC inspiration indeed), but
I never really looked at the mechanism there.
This is just too great to have any remorse shamelessly copying :-/
I wonder if regular cams (6575) might work too, I don’t see why not...
hummmm...
Jean-Marc
|
Speaking of remorseless shameless copying, I spent an hour and half last night
trying to build the crankshaft.
I can’t figure out the pattern those pulley wheels are using, especially how
much space is between them. It doesn’t look like the space is always the same,
but maybe that’s because you had the same troubles I was having. Sometimes a
4-stud axle is too long, and a 3-stud axle is usually too short. Bah!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Two New GBC Modules..
|
| (...) It's hard to tell from that picture, but pause the video and you'll see the balls run up at a 6-stud spacing. That means the peaks of the wave are six studs apart. The cams are spaced with one pulley plus a half bush, so are spaced exactly one (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Two New GBC Modules..
|
| (...) Thanks! I knew of that site (which is very great GBC inspiration indeed), but I never really looked at the mechanism there. This is just too great to have any remorse shamelessly copying :-/ I wonder if regular cams (6575) might work too, I (...) (17 years ago, 12-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
