 | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | (...) I've come up with three AND gate technologies so far. Also I've come up with three OR gate designs too (those are differential output, plus I have a single pressure OR too). I've only come up with one differential XOR and a single pressure (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | (...) There's probably no limit to the number of designs, but only a few will have a situation where they are the best one. Different designs are better in different situations. Of the differential output designs that provide output hoses to both (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote: <snip> (...) Is there such a thing?!?! :^) Kev (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | (...) An effect of too many trains? Perhaps a one track mind :-) Mark (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I was referring to "too many trains"! I believe any and all claims of too much LEGO to be false. Assuming your trains are all LEGO, then I beleive your "too many trains" to be false also! (...) This too. (...) Kev (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Pneumatic "One Leg at a Time" Robot Circuit —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | (...) Haha! Yes, I could never have too many trains, but a bigger house would be an advantage since I could run 16 8mm scale trains on a big enough layout. I have a long-term plan for a warehouse full as a museum :-) However, too much concentration (...) (19 years ago, 18-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
