To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14558
14557  |  14559
Subject: 
Re: Brickfest Pneumatic Master and new Pneumatic Gate Circuits
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:14:17 GMT
Viewed: 
5217 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:

[SNIP]


I've done some more study in order to investigate the 3-input gate, using the
4-switch module in multiple.  This has shown me how the original 4-switch module
from your sketch is an AND gate in its own right, as long as the differential
pressure input is one input and the switch position is the other input.  A
reverser between stages can invert the differential pressure input, making
endless possibilities for the logic function of the system, by allowing the
output to be high in 1, 3, 5, or 7 of the eight combinations of three inputs.

The design process here was very simple:

  Mark Tarrabain's wonderfully simple single switch AND gate does not produce
differential pressure.  What do I have to add to this gate to get the other
phase of differential pressure?

  The result is adding three switches.

  I then asked myself "what does it take to make a single pressure OR gate?".
This took 3 switches.  I enhanced to differntial pressure by adding one more
switch.


Seeing the 4-switch module that way, and using it in multiple, makes for a gate
without any extra propagation delays due to daisy-chaining.  It's also more
cost-effective, since only four switches are required.  For a gate with two
switch position inputs (rather than one switch position and one differential
pressure), one of the switches driven by "A" can be trimmed from my diagram,
making a 1+4++4 gate.

Yes, hooking Mark's single switch AND gates in series comprises a multi-input
AND gate.  This is fabulous for making sequencers, because you minimize the time
and the part count.


I still like the elegance of my 3+3 design, especially because it's symmetrical,
but the most elegant solution is rarely the sleekest!  In pneumatics there is
more to be said for reducing parts count because the parts are so expensive.
That's where 1+4++4 scores over 3+3++4.

Overall this means that a set of combinational logic can be achieved with
4-switch AND modules and 4-switch reversers such that there is only a single
propagation delay between states, which is good for machines whose timing is
critical, such as your walkers.

Yes, it makes the slow walkers not as slow :^)  But like I said, I stick to the
single switch AND gates for my walkers.


Mark

Kevin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Brickfest Pneumatic Master and new Pneumatic Gate Circuits
 
(...) Yes, I can see how the 2-cylinder design is more cost-effective, particularly since a Backhoe has 10 cylinders and only 7 switches. That allows more cylinders to be used for AND and OR gates, saving the switches for XOR gates. I've done some (...) (19 years ago, 28-Aug-05, to lugnet.technic)

32 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR