 | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Kung-Khoon Quah
|
| | | (...) You are welcome Eric. Although I was surprised someone beat me to the punch. I was thinking of posting this morning after mediation from Brickshelf but looks like its OK. Also, I was surprised someone did not post earlier pics. And this is the (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Kung-Khoon Quah
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry for the problem with the links. The new FTX format must be throwing it off and I cannot seem to preview so hope this works. (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | | (...) Links in FTX require an opening < and closing >. Todd, perhaps you could turn on the same "www." and "(URL) recognition that plain text uses for FTX? Some sort of hard character return recognition would be nice too...I'm not in the habit of (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) No, you just forgot the <>'s, that's all. By all means, feel free to select plain text if you're not comfortable posting in FTX! (...) What happens when you click the Preview button?? --Todd (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | | Nice motor and gear cases. I would like a few of them :) First I have a few question: 1. What is the small grooves beside the axelholes? If you look closly too all three pieces you will see some small grooves in the casing around the outside of the (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Kung-Khoon Quah
|
| | | | | | | (...) There is a groove around the axleholes or a larger hole. The inside of this larger hole has small teeth on it. Interesting but I am not sure of its use since an axle will connect to the other pieces. It could be a sleeve for another kind of (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Trevyn Watson
|
| | | | | | (...) As i was looking at the picutres, I was thinking: "Where have I seen something lioke that before?". And then I realised: (URL) end of that piece looks a lot like the teeth in those new pieces. I only have piece 41681, and not the piece that it (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | | | "Trevyn Watson" <4tee2@rogers.com> wrote in message news:HFtDoq.A9v@lugnet.com... (...) too (...) the (...) attached (...) I don't have any of those pieces, but on #8558-1: Cahdok and Gahdok I found this piece (URL) look like the counterparts for (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —John Guerquin
|
| | | | | | (...) I also have the new 4094 Inventor set. After disassembling the 90 degree gearbox, and comparing the grooves with the new clicky joints of (URL) #8558-1 Cahdok and Gahdok, here are some observations: 1. The grooves LOOK similar to part (URL), (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Iain Hendry
|
| | | | | | (...) Oh, how sad, you just lost your masters. Sorry. :: revoke masters wand appears :: Iain (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | Oh Oh, please excuse my excitment. I often surf the web for breif stints if I am restless late at night. I noticed these pictures and got really excited! Thank you again for uploading these. Sorry about the post jumping. Now, let the hoarding begin! (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I already ordered two sets ;^) Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | (...) Ahh, you know what's good! So, we'll have a new class of Clear Motor Walker soon! e (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) Meeee two, I ordered two that is. I'll get mine and make a walker before you! LOL! The challange is on! e (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) Good luck! (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | I Win! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I ordered mine second day air before you even created the challenge. It showed up today. I've got my first walker. Not pretty, but is made exclusively from parts in 4094. I win! LOL! (URL) (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I Win! —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) Doh! You win! I'll get you yet! P.S. I got mine yesterday. P.S. The worm gear box is a superior design, less backlash, stays crispy in milk. e (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: I Win! —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) But it's still a worm gear, so it's really only good for positioning devices, not for gear reduction. I agree with others that a small, efficient gear reducer would be more useful than another worm. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I Win! —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) But, its an improvement. How many threads have been tossed around complaining about the backlash problem with worm gears and the various gear boxes. I'm telling you that this new gear box is an improved version of the old config. What's with (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
