 | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Miguel Agullo
|
| | | My two cents: 1. The current technic electric motor needs traditional technic bricks to conect it to the newer liftarm elements - but is it being officially replaced by spybiotics/rc components? My bet is not. 2. The economics of a liftarm-based (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | "miguel agullo" <technicpuppy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDBuAA.z3r@lugnet.com... (...) plz no!!! i want to have traditional technic motors they can be modified to use with liftarms but let them exist as motors not as (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | "pixel" <pixsrv@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message news:HDBwD1.148o@lugnet.com... (...) good sentence :))) ...from the other hand... sorry pixel (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | "pixel" <pixsrv@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message news:HDBwD1.148o@lugnet.com... (...) news:HDBuAA.z3r@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) superhero-multi-purp...act-module (...) I hope the Technic motors never goes out of production, actually I hope they (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
