 | | Re: John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
|
(...) All this time I thought that my dad owning his own excavation business would never get me anywhere in life. Well, today proved me wrong; it's helped my machinery vocabulary. Of course, I still didn't have any clue about the JD690-B part. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Technica needs a new home
|
|
Hi: After 6+ years on my local ISP's w3.one.net server Technica needs to find a new home. OneNet was bought out by NuVox in St Louis and tonight when I tried to update the site I found out the server is down. A call to St Louis suggests that this (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
|
(...) Thats the word I was looking for! It wasn't coming too my head then I posted. Josh (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: John Deere JD690-B excavator
|
|
(...) Hadn't thought of that! Have to try it on another model (or maybe on this one)! Josh (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: John Deere JD690-B excavator
|
|
(...) Did you try using bent technic beams for the "bend" in the boom? May look even better, if the angle is right. ROSCO (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
|
Actually, that's not a backhoe. It's an excavator. (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
|
(...) I'm pitching that camera soon, I REALLY need one that can get good pics of Lego's. Josh (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
But can you actually put batteries in the battery boxes? Lego doesn't make batteries! <grin> (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
(...) I think it's the 2x6 weight you refer too? It's very hard to find that part outside US w/o using Bricklink since Dacta is limited. Still, they are very expensive. Come to think about it a batterybox should do the trick in most cases. The rules (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
(...) What I meant was to ask the group if modifications should be allowed or not. Sorry if my English made you think otherwise. It's not always easy to write in English when my mind keep thinking in Swedish. Here's my text I wrote to you: "I'm (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
|
Looks very good! I like the job you did on the bucket. It looks very real. Amazing what you have done at that small scale. You really need a "macro mode" on that camera. The pictures don't do justice to your work. I hope you will post the final (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
|
This one, like my CAT 980G, is almost done, it is minus a good bucket, tracks for one side (which are supposedly in the mail!), & a few plates (also coming). I liked the cab design on it, which inabled me to use up one of those windows! It uses (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
(...) There were personal e-mails between me and Tobbe. In an e-mail to me, Tobbe tells me, I have been found breaking the rules. He also goes on to say how he does not know a punishment, and he will ask the group. My understanding, from his (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Brian Sadowski writes: [Additional stuff added from Tobbe's post] (...) [snip] (...) I agree, and I don't see any problem specifically allowing non-LEGO elements such as yours in future MoTeCs, however the current rules (as (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Sorry for Double Post
|
|
Opps, sorry, I did not mean to double post that (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
(...) Nope, and I'll tell you why. It is my MOC which is subject to debate. In my shrimp rover, on one of the wheels I used the non-lego parts which are in question. Here is the picture: (URL) is the MOC: (URL) you can clearly see the two plastic (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
(...) Nope, and I'll tell you why. It is my MOC which is subject to debate. In my shrimp rover, on one of the wheels I used the non-lego parts which are in question. Here is the picture: (URL) is the MOC: (URL) you can clearly see the two plastic (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
|
<<snip>> (...) <<snip>> Hi, once more I manage to grow a big thread in lugnet.technic. I've read 'em all up to now and it looks like the "Yes"-side is bigger then the "No"-side. Still, I feel I don't want to let the modified and "pure" MOC's fight (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Black, Grey and Yellow trials motor bike -- Help wanted
|
|
Sounds like you purchased the 8838. Is this a match with the Brickshelf scan? (URL) this helps, Adrian Egli "Keith Fishlock" <raider__man@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gvx19u.7wz@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Black, Grey and Yellow trials motor bike -- Help wanted
|
|
Can anyone help me - I recently purchased a Technic Black, Grey and Yellow Trials motor bike with white spoked wheels, spring suspension front and back, 2 moving cylinders driven by a black chain. The problem is that I can't get any building (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
