 | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
(...) nice and did not drop them at all. BTW what do you use those weights for anyway? I can't see any muscular overload with that amount of weight .) (...) Yes, they exist but I don't think they are that many. I might be wrong though :) I feel they (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
I can't really disagree with your points. (...) True enough. (...) That's subjective, but it certainly is oversimplified kiddie-cartoon quality. (...) You probably just wish they'd spend that much effort promoting the other sets. It does make you (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New Lego Contest for Technic Builders.
|
|
I created a Lego contest for Technic builders that I hope you will take part in. Visit my website at (URL) for details. (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) background of .technic?! I sure have. To tell you the truth though, I absolutely hate bionicle. Why? Here's a few of my reasons as to why Bionicle is the bane of bricks... (1) Over-done specialty parts that have not pareticular use outside of (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) I agree with Mike Edwards that most of the traffic has moved over to BZCommunity.com. And why wouldn't it? It seems like the very mention of Bionicle here on LUGNET prompts overkill threads like this. :) I manage online communities for a (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Constructopedia
|
|
(...) The animations are nifty. I look forward to more entries. (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Lego Constructopedia
|
|
I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but Lego has an online constructopedia: (URL) added a link to this on the Technic newsgroup sidebar. TJ (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) And a "Dark Age" will begin for many :< Ron (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) the biggest single Bionicle discussion wasn't about Bionicle dierctly but about the avatars on Brickshelf. A regrettably polarizing situation that was resolved nicely by the various admins. - Kyle (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) Stipulated! I thought the fact of your response to the challenge was acceptance enough. :) I'm thinking of giving it a go myself, but I'm afraid the existence of such a massively recursive Technic model may open a rift in the time/space (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle folks went away?
|
|
The Technic Logo is conspiciously absent from _ALL_ 2002 "Technic" sets that we've seen boxes for thus far (Bionicle, Racers, Star Wars). I mentioned this in a past thread. IMHO, TLC will eventually phase out the Technic brand completely (just like (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
(...) Oh, it does move alright. Especially when you drop 16 pounds on it: (URL)Maybe bridges belong somewhere else altoghether. Do you think we need a (...) I dunno about that. Have you seen: (URL) it seems every train layout has at least 2 or 3 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
How about lugnet.train.bridges...n-problems for the newsgroup? :-)) W -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Tobbe Arnesson Sent: 15 March 2002 15:46 To: lugnet.technic@lugnet.com (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
(...) cp lugnet.train sure, why not .) (still kidding) (...) Yes, but does it qualify as technic when nothings moving? :) (...) Nah, don't think there are enough bridge builders as of yet. /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) Just to add some more fuel to this, everybody HAS noticed that the 'Technic' logo is conspicuous by it's absence on the new Bionicle Bohrok and Bohrok-Va products and catalogues, haven't they? ;-) Maybe somebody DID take it up with Lego?!? (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Spectrum as source of Technic Spares
|
|
With all of the back and forth lately on the lack of Technic spares, I've found that Spectrum Educational Supplies in Aurora Ontario has many hard-to-get parts, including the little pneumatic pumps. Without keeping everyone in suspense... Specturm (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
Why don't we just have one *HUGE* newsgroup and then apply our own e-mail filters! :-)) W PS - I'm not serious! -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Thomas Avery Sent: 15 March 2002 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
(...) LOL Hey! Do you want to start another flame-war? ;-) I've wondered about this myself. I think bridges are of interest to both groups. My bridge is made of mostly Technic parts, and my question was about construction technics involving Technic (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
|
(...) You have my word :) (...) Yeah, that's always something :) (...) Of course I have never tried to build a bridge or anything that uses a truss (sp?) as of yet. And BTW bridges should be .train or something, it's not Technic! *joking* /Tobbe (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
|
(...) carry big sets not parts :( (...) Thanks but it's a little late, say two years or since I got out of my dark ages cave :) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
