 | | Re: Erroded axles
|
|
Not the best picture, but dust heaps non-the less: (URL) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Erroded axles
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Fredrik Glöckner writes: <snip> (...) Lubrication has been discussed quite a bit before. Be sure to check out "lubrication" under the Popular Subjects and FAQ section on the Technic front page: (URL) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Erroded axles
|
|
(...) It is pretty normal to experience wear in LEGO axles and bushings and so on. In my experince, this is happens when you have a fast turning axle which runs for an extended period of time, especially when there is some load on the axle. I have (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | LoTek updates, MoTeC & SSPP
|
|
Hi! I finally got time to update my page again. Changed name on my monthly technic competition/challenge into MoTeC - Monthly Technic Creation! (URL) added my first entry to the Single set power pulling challenge and also a second entry for MoTeC. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
Wow! This biped is awsome. Joe has some very slick designs, I am completly humbled by this simplicity of this particular biped. It even turns, which is VERY hard to implement. There are other bipeds that claim to turn..I have serious doubts about (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Erroded axles
|
|
Hallo to everyone first, sorry to all language purists, it's not my native language. I like treaded vehicles so i built very simple one using rubber treads from RIS 1.5 set. ( actually it was "tank" very similar to "dozer" from RIS 1.0, but without (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
(...) Hammerhead is very tricky to adjust correctly. I'll be putting some more tips on how to achieve it properly on my site. Miguel Agullo (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatics: the old and the new
|
|
Very nice design. I don't have access to old style pneumatic cylinders, but was thinking of doing something similar with the new double acting cylinders. Because I don't have a check valve in the new pneumatics that would allow me to store vacuum, I (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
Very cool. Should be able to do it with two motors. I wonder how he sync's the left and right feet. It doesn't look like any sensors are used, or am I missing the wires? I am inspired. P.S. I was also inspired by hammerhead. Since I only had the 9v (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
(...) Hey, I said *inspiring* ;-) Actually, if you're familiar with Hammerhead (a MOC on my site) or other ankle-bending bipeds, you'll see how Joe has come up with new aand refreshing solutions for this kind of robots. If you're not so specialized (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: A very inspiring design
|
|
(...) next book? (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | A very inspiring design
|
|
Hi all, This new robot by Joe Nagata integrates so many solutions in such a simple design that I have little doubt it will be as instantly inspiring to many of you as it has been to me. (URL) building! Miguel Agullo (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Single acting pneumatics with spring return
|
|
(...) True, but there is one notable difference, as others have pointed out before: When compressiong air, the pressure difference is limited only by implementation details. The pressure inside the tank usually is not just slightly higher than (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) They are, but not for the reasons you state. (...) But LDraw *does* create LEGO models. Whether a model's physical parameters are stored in ABS molecules or mathematical data is irrelevant. Either method is an equally valid representation of (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) He's alive! All this time I've been mis-pronouncing "loog-net" over and over in my head, just to flush him out. All we had to do was use his name in vain! KL P.S. just kidding about the "loog-net" thing :) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) I'm not resisting, I've been occupied the past week. Hope to fix it tomorrow :) I still have not decided on the name... /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Website monthly update
|
|
This months updates include: *added new Tohunga/Matorian mocs *added Balance to Turaga mocs *uploaded new Govi, Agariki, and Kapuhoi images on Toa mocs page *uploaded new Nicole, Roman and Krys images on characters page *uploaded new Roman axe and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ny.bin, lugnet.org.us.lucny, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
To be honest, if I went looking for something called the Technic MOTM, I'd probably go to ldraw.org first to find it. So, I think you can call it what you want, but something else might be better. "MoTEC" just sounds so cool, how can you resist? (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
I actually think L-Draw is in the wrong here. They use the 'MOTM' meaning Model of the Month..we all know that. My case is, Lego is used to create 'Models'.. L-Draw is a cad, graphics system, which in my eys does not create lego models at all. You (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes (quoting Tim Courtney): (...) Actually, I wouldn't mind. (...) Personally, I think your choice makes a lot of sense, and I agree with you that it would be good for the community to have a simple and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic) !
|
