 | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
"John Heins" <Johnmhiii@aol.com> wrote in message news:Grv2G6.zH@lugnet.com... (...) bricks. Forgive me if I am missing something obvious here, but it is possible to use the holes in studless beams and liftarms to clip directly onto studs in bricks (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Excavator Pics
|
|
"William Howard" <william@howard-fami...rld.co.uk> wrote in message n (...) the (...) Given the space constraints I certainly couldn't find any other way, and it took me long enough to work out that one. For a long time in fact I had my doubts it (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Excavator Pics
|
|
"Rebecca Taylor" <arellcat@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote (...) www.brickshelf.com/c...?m=techgrl . The modifications to the JCB are very interesting, especially making the boom offset. (...) point (...) one-cylinder (...) Well as it happens that, like (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Excavator Pics
|
|
(...) point (...) one-cylinder (...) I actually understood that - thanks! The real reason for the redesign of the boom/bucket linkage on the excavator is that I've used a different bucket and the attachment points have a different geometry. But, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
"John Heins" <Johnmhiii@aol.com> wrote in message news:Grv2G6.zH@lugnet.com... (...) [snippage] (...) Not to beat this to death, but this is plainly false. Here are some ways to connect non-studded technic parts to studded parts. - simply stick the (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Excavator Pics
|
|
(...) Hi all, It's my first post to the group so by way of an introduction I suppose, there are a few pictures at www.brickshelf.com/c...?m=techgrl . Jennifer, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a kinematic singularity a point in the motion of a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: 8464
|
|
(URL) in The Netherlands as well! A bit pricy (I paid about $25 less for mine), but it currently the only one anywhere. W -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Maico Arts Sent: 20 (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 8464
|
|
Hello (...) for (...) Can anyone get a 8464 for me? In the Netherlands I have never seen the set... (yes I know, it used to be 8459, but I want this one either) Or its this the wrong place to ask? If so, please accept my apologies... greetings Maico (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Gremlin II and New MOC
|
|
Wow, that's really cool. I tried the same thing with a Life on Mars alien, but couldn't get it to work out. I'll have to try your idea. -gyug (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) Brad may not know. That's fair enough. But someone knows. And this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Think of the money being lost by not undercutting the prices found on eBay and private websites. They could sell these, but for some (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
