 | | Linear Actuator
|
|
I remember once seeing a very compact linear actuator that someone made using a micro-motor, a worm gear, and a very small number of other parts. But I can't find it anywhere now. Does anyone else remember this? (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTek, a new Technic homepage with some new MOC's!
|
|
(...) quite cool as well. I especially like the Lynx Mk. I and the Technic joystick creations :-) -Gaurav Thakur, raving madman Can be reached at cp5670@supermail.com (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
(URL) pretty sure C S Soh has one there, he has EVERYTHING pneumatic. He's running a terrific pneumatic page. Tom Heverly (...) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Termight
|
|
An octopod walker: (URL) love to hear some criticism. (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
Mario Ferrari did a "robot" for a Sumo competition in Italy: (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re:Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
(...) Joe Nagata built a "Air Engine Car": (URL) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTek, a new Technic homepage with some new MOC's!
|
|
Snyggt jobbat, Det är det enda jag kan säga Snygg, stilren. Fortsätt i den här stilen /Martin "Tobbe Arnesson" <tnt@arnesson.nu> wrote in message news:3ae9c2b0.466601...net.com... (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatically driven locomotive ??
|
|
I know someone built a pneumatically driven car... Anyone in lugnet.technic remember who it was/where the pics are? Duq (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | LoTek, a new Technic homepage with some new MOC's!
|
|
<< followups to lugnet.technic >> Hi! After much work and frustration I have finally finished my homepage enough to publish it OnLine and tell you folks it exists! So, rush over there and enjoy. Among the new projects I can recommend my Hercules in (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jennifer Clark (<3AE83CC5.1C8501F1@...e.dmem.str ath.ac.uk>) wrote at 15:20:37 (...) But only a creative use of a bad part. If they didn't make so many bad pieces that they can *only* find 'creative' uses for, the sets would (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
"Jennifer Clark" <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> wrote (...) I am the only one here who didn't like this model? I picked it up < half price but still rate it as one of my least fave sets (well, out of the ones I own anyway). Only really good points (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Yeah. For how good a set that is I'm surprised it was a Shop at Home exclusive, therefore relegating it to "lesser-known" status. (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Agreed! I think that this was the only 1999 set that could stand up to some of the sets from previous years...it has a lot of functionality integrated into a relatively small unit. And yeah, it is a very good example of the fact that high (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
(...) I've also been trying to look for some large pictures of this model but have not had any luck. I have seen one picture of it but it is pretty small (384x288). From the little that I've seen and heard of it though, it looks like a stunning set (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Not entirely a bad thing but I've been looking in to alot of harvesters for forest use lately and I guess this one is supposed to be some sort of hartvester/lumber crane. (...) Also very clever use of the bent beams to secure things. My (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
Don't have any pictures but this is good news! I thought it would be more expensive. *sigh* Guess I have to convince my g/f once again that this is a relly rare set that is special in so many ways that I want to buy it... But I'll wat for the model (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Or $35 each, at after-Christmas sales. :) :) Actually, one thing that K'nex (the company) is doing right is to reissue their 'classic sets'. The Roller Coaster and the Big Ball Factory reappear on store shelves every year, right around (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Indeed, if the green bits were replaced with white it would remind me of one of the Eagle spaceships from Space 1999. A bad Moon series as opposed to bad Mars movie - close enough I think :-) I am still not convinced this is an entirely bad (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Does anyone have a REALLY GOOD photo of the the 8466
|
|
I've found two sites with photos of the 8466 4x4 but when I tried to print them up they weren't that good :-( I'm just guessing these photos were posted in 640x480 but I want to get a better look at the details. Any better photos are welcome. I just (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
