 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I always thought ZNAP was Lego's answear to K'nex (spit!), which is probably why it failed, nobody want's either. Of course K'nex is a huge failure, shame the people who make it (and the people who buy it) haven't realised that yet! :-). Steve (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I think ZNAP was an exciting departure for Lego. I am only sorry to see it effectively withdrawn before it had a chance. And I hope, like Ralph appears to, that it may not have been the end. If you compare todays ZNAP parts with original Lego (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
<snip>....Znap was another radical new direction, and those failed. ZNAP was LEGO? I thought that it was just a way to disguise the gear motor, battery box, and flex-shafts in a discount aisle.... Seriously though, I think that ZNAP was not quite (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) MOC. (...) Yeah, actually it does. The techbots are more like Lego-spinoffs than actual Lego sets. Not-Lego sets that happen to be made by Lego corp. I don't think Lego themselves minds that though. They wanted to see if they could be (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New silver Hau ! and Tohunga . . .
|
|
I have spoken to Lego UK about 8546 - its confrimed to be released in the UK on May 1st 2001 So i will have to wait 5 days for mine :-) Michael (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
