 | | Re: Looks like good boom material
|
|
(...) Looks like it is, thanks. And from other replies I got, the verdict is that its difficult to interface with LEGO. Bummer. ROSCO (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: large crane -- Update!
|
|
(...) The update is finally up on the web at (URL) crane will be shown for the first time in public on October 9th at the next BayLUG meeting (details here: (URL) I plan on taking a series of pictures showing the setup process. Greetings, David (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks like good boom material
|
|
(...) At first glance that looks like FischerTechnik to me ((URL) and (URL) but I might be wrong. Hope that helps. (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Looks like good boom material
|
|
Does anyone know what these are made from? (URL) of Modelshow Europe in Geldermalsen 2004 by Wolfgang Esbruch) ROSCO (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: KONECRANES 60 ton Container Crane - Prototype Complete
|
|
Hi everyone, (2 URLs) I have now finished the description of my project of the Container Crane, please visit my site and read more about it, including a lot of pictures and videos. (URL) Welcome on my site, Anders Gaasedal - LEGO Mobile Cranes (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Dennis Bossman's crane
|
|
I made a mistake the last time I posted a message. I used the word "better." There is not any such thing as better when it comes to legos, only "different." Sorry for the confusion. "RoscoHead" has a nicely built 5-meter-high crane posted on (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anybody know the story behind 8847?
|
|
(...) Or, maybe they just ran production on 8844 before 8847 & ran out of toggle connectors? :) No, your explanation makes sense (that they'd have switched the connection for durability reasons) but I'm left wondering why they'd have even used the (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anybody know the story behind 8847?
|
|
"Jennifer Clark" <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> schreef in bericht news:I4srzK.1pC6@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) As a matter of fact, this drawing of those multi part shocks, gave me the idea to build them at that time. Those BIC balpoints have a (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anybody know the story behind 8847?
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:I4rqvD.2237@lugnet.com... (...) with the (...) changed (...) I'm almost certain it wasn't - I received this set when it was released and it had the one piece shocks in it. I did notice (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anybody know the story behind 8847?
|
|
(...) I think that's the main reason. The Technic Connector Toggle Joint Toothed (4273 (URL) is not a good part (the teeth are easily broken, the connexion is weak). Guys who have built the 8844 cockpit know that. That's certainly why this part has (...) (20 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
