 | | Whining about studless parts: was Pneumatics book?
|
|
(...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
(...) Cool, I look forward to it. I ended up adding two 1x4's per leg on my hexapod. They fit nicely. It looks very burly with all those switches though. All the structure and pneumatic parts are there, except hoses and T's. Hooking up all the hoses (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatics book?
|
|
(...) Has anyone noticed all of the rich variety of parts available to the modern stud-free system that have no comparable equivalent in the old stud-dependant system? Take, for instance, these parts: (URL) triple liftarm> (URL) 1x2 flat liftarm> (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatics book?
|
|
(...) Sorry for replying to my own post but I've just had another thought. Has anyone else noticed all the ancillary junk needed to build a studless creation? Compare it with the basic studded version, all you have is beams, of varying lengths, 1xn (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatics book?
|
|
(...) I've long held the opinion that it is a lot harder to make rigid structures using studless beams. I have yet to build anything of worth entirely from studless, despite multiple attempts. Steve (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
|
(...) If you're short of space you can always double the reverser back on itself if you're using the new switches from 8455, in a similar way to your picture. That's why I like the new switches. A 2x2 switch module is probably easier to accomodate (...) (20 years ago, 9-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Generic replacement for flex hose
|
|
Model Airplane fuel hosing makes a good substitute for pneumatic hoses too. Lots of pretty colors. (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO at the Bauma 2004 construction equipment trade fair
|
|
(...) That is supposed to be shown if the picture cannot be rendered, for example in text browser of when rendering as speech. (...) Why not use standard text next to the pictures, that would be the best. IMHO tooltips and the like are an "annoyance (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO at the Bauma 2004 construction equipment trade fair
|
|
(...) Yes, I felt about the same but with the drawback that you had to share these toys with thousands of other people :-( During the seven days of the show, about 410000 visitors were counted. (...) In comparison to the T 282 B in the background, (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO at the Bauma 2004 construction equipment trade fair
|
|
(...) I suppose you mean the LG 1750. This is an all new crane from Liebherr which uses an eight axle chassis with all wheel steering and four driven axles that carries the four support legs. All the other components have to be transported (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
