To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / *12736 (-10)
  Re: New MOC: Car chassis
 
(...) What if you used an inline four engine design instead of the V6? It should allow the front chassis, and therefore the steering rack, to be not as wide. I don't really think it would affect the realism of the model. Actually, if it's not (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
 
  Updated my Technic-Gallery: 8428 , 8853 and 8858
 
Hi, made some new pics of my technic sets: (URL) you'll like them :) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: 8880 Supercar
 
Hi, thnx. I painteed the background on my own ;) Mainly for the castle-sets but I figured out that technic looks quite nice with that background, too. I'll translate the 8880-Page someday :) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: 8880 Supercar
 
Jep, the car was extremly dusty...but some hours later after washing the bricks where like new ones !! I've got the original box of my 8880, too. :) I'll make some pictures some day. Kai (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Zipper--the two-piece flying helicopter
 
"Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:HG0rH4.Ho2@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) > the propeller... (...) yeah so we can stop talking i thought the idea is to buid flying machine (as pure as possible from lego parts) because (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: My site is down :-(
 
Site seems ok, And everything seems to be up'n'running btw Dennis, the Audi you have, is that a S2?? In that case, I have an RS6!!! Whats up? "Dennis Bosman" <dennisbosman@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HEyuxG.GqL@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic, lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Zipper--the two-piece flying helicopter
 
"Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:HG0rs4.Jx1@lugnet.com... (...) this is probably true but we set this idea some time ago and we came to the same conclusion and we are trying to use as less as possible non-lego (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: I Win!
 
(...) But, its an improvement. How many threads have been tossed around complaining about the backlash problem with worm gears and the various gear boxes. I'm telling you that this new gear box is an improved version of the old config. What's with (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  RE: I Win!
 
(...) But it's still a worm gear, so it's really only good for positioning devices, not for gear reduction. I agree with others that a small, efficient gear reducer would be more useful than another worm. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: I Win!
 
(...) Doh! You win! I'll get you yet! P.S. I got mine yesterday. P.S. The worm gear box is a superior design, less backlash, stays crispy in milk. e (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR