 | | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9IqBA.99@lugnet.com... (...) hi it's a little summary of us :))) BEGIN Filled in form (edit his part) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...-+-+-+-+-+ Name: lugnet .technic member Nickname: AFOL Age: (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Actually, in my opinion, if the set were named Columbia, it would be a bigger seller, as it would now be a souvenir, or memorabilia for this recent tragic event. Sales-wise I'd call it unlucky. Just my $0.02 worth. Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I love the age posted on the helicopter box (4403). 0-99!!!! Yay! Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
"TJ Avery" <tjavery@texbrick.com> wrote in message news:H9qHFq.JFL@lugnet.com... (...) Now THAT'S what I've been waiting to see :-) I figured Technic was not completely dead; just seeing what is in the 2003 Pitsco gave me some assurance. But that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
This stuff is great!! I remember about three years ago, Lego said it would be about three years before they could begin emerging from the Junior Age. I've been waiting patiently for this to actually occur and am pleased that they stuck to their (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) get my money. Just wish I didnt have to wait 6 months to get it tho :( (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | orrery update
|
|
My Orrery page has been getting a lot of hits from the link on Andrew Lipson's page (Thanks, Andrew!) so I thought I'd let people know I've added the LDraw files and put up some other projects at (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Now that's a bit of irony, those space sets. Imagine if they had chosen Colombia instead of Discovery... Regardless...SWEETNESS!!! Except for the continuing death of studs in Technic, this year's line rocks! Those sculptured noses, those boxcar (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) it just wouldn't go nearly as fast, which is something I am, at least for this project, not prepared to live with. Also, the solar panel is nearly 2 kilo's, with the car at 900 grams, of which like 260grams is taken by the wheels, that would (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
"Gillish" <gillish@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:H9qLwq.9uJ@lugnet.com... (...) sunny (...) exactly (...) same (...) That is a very powerful solar panel compared to Lego Solar. It would be interesting to build a larger chassis and see if you (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Pretty cool... I really like the new age marking 8-99 !!!...!!! I wonder how well the space shuttle will sell.... Frank Buiting <felsir@chello.nl> wrote in message news:H9qMuF.CFy@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Looks like Lego were lucky when they picked the name for the Space Shuttle... Duq "Frank Buiting" <felsir@chello.nl> wrote in message news:H9qLpD.92L@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: MAN in ...blue
|
|
(...) Mumble...mumble...,may be an interesting improvment, why not !!!! (...) In Zwolle our main dream was a photo with you and ours models in your hands... .... we hope in Legoworld 2003!!!! From October, we had restiled some particular and add (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new electrics
|
|
no but new sets are using less and less bricks which are replaced by more and more liftarms so... regards pixel "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrdel6pe6uy.fsf....uio.no... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new electrics
|
|
(...) Are you saying that LEGO has officially said that it shall discontinue the production of technic bricks with studs? Fredrik -- (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
(...) (URL) Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) oops, forgot to crosspost to trains and starwars. (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) I've tested the solar panel some more today, and I've messured it giving 8 watts to the lego motor now, at 15:15 in the afternoon on yet another sunny winterday in Holland. I can only wonder what it would give in mid summer...unfortunately the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) More pictures: (URL) guess these pictures also interest starwars and train fans. -Frank ps. when discussing the models on the pictures, please keep discussion in the correct groups. (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
