Subject:
|
Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Sep 1999 00:56:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
icestorm@inwaveANTISPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
2190 times
|
| |
|
|
Kevin Loch wrote:
>
> I hate to be completely A.R., but what does everyone think is the better
> storage
> method: attached or loose? Do attached bricks get used to being
> attached and loose
> their "snap"? Do loose bricks get scratched faster than attached
> bricks?
>
> KL
Loose. I like stacked, but because of cracking I'm convinced loose is the
proper way to store them.
Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
| I hate to be completely A.R., but what does everyone think is the better storage method: attached or loose? Do attached bricks get used to being attached and loose their "snap"? Do loose bricks get scratched faster than attached bricks? KL (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
