Subject:
|
Re: Possible ATST woes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sun, 13 Aug 2000 18:49:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
475 times
|
| |
|
|
I have to disagree mr Nassar,
I have built quite a couple of AT-ST models myself and there is no way that
the click-hinges are strong enough to keep the head up. Maybe when you use 2
side by side but that would make the legs too thick and it would take a lot
more pieces to make the legs.
Just one man's humble opinion,
Jay
Ps. lets hope that the info (which none of read offcourse LOL) had a typo in
it and the AT-ST will be a little bit more expensive. If there will be an AT-
ST in the first place...
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Possible ATST woes
|
| (...) Jay, I think you are wrong. Actually I know you have to be wrong, since my new "Locust IIC" got nothing but 2 click-hinges to keep the head up (one click- hinge for each leg), and the hinges are doing a fine job. Primus BuS ComStar LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Possible ATST woes
|
| (...) Mr. Cal... I'm going to have to contradict you here... The first thing I did when I heard about the $10 ATST was a little experiment. I built one exactly as I suggested and it certainly does stand up. It looks like crap, but it stands up. If (...) (24 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Possible ATST woes
|
| (...) huge (...) Not necessarily... In fact, with the click-hinges, it's possible to make working legs with less pieces than the "shifting/sliding" ones. This is what I expect: The foot will be the landing pad plate used in the rock-raiders. (1 (...) (24 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
