 | | Minifigure sets @ Star Wars Insider —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | I just visited the bricks to bothans websites and became aware of that LEGO will be selling two minifigure 3-pack sets. Set #1: Solo, Fett and Luke #WTY4080 Set #2: Emperor Palpatine, Vader and Maul #WTY4081 The website has a picture of them. My (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Minifigure sets @ Star Wars Insider —Andrew Tyrone
|
| | | | | (...) Could you give us the link to the site? -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Minifigure sets @ Star Wars Insider —Kyle Keppler
|
| | | | | | | (...) these (...) It is on the Lugnnet starwars main area and is here: (URL)Agent 0007 (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Minifigure sets @ Star Wars Insider —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | It's on the lugnet.starwars main page under "Fan Sites." If you use a newsreader, I suppose you wouldn't know that though. :^) (...) LEGO (...) for these (...) wars (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Minifigure sets @ Star Wars Insider —Mark Herzberg
|
| | | | (...) these (...) Am I the only one that thinks these just might be fake sets? I know that Darth Vader is hard to find and all and appears in only one set, but this seems suspicious. (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Minifigure sets @ Star Wars Insider —Alan Gerber
|
| | | | | (...) Well, they are on the official starwars.com site, so I think it is beleiveable. Alan (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers —Dave Lovelace
|
| | | | (...) Just got off the phone with S@H (had to order the 7181 and 7190...dang, I hate waiting for payday), and asked about these mini-figs. The are real, they just aren't being backordered from TLC yet. I've read about how they'll be cheaper from S@H (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) ...probably an error by the marketing department, however. I doubt the actual set will ship with a photo of the Emperor for Luke's stand. I wouldn't recommend buying it hoping there's a mistake, you'll probably be disappointed. I'm anxiously (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers —Andrew Pruette
|
| | | | (...) It is possible they intend for it to be Luke standing in front of the Emperor to make it a sort of movie "mini-scene." I don't think they meant the photo of the Emperor to be a depiction of the minifig in front of the photo, since five of the (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers —Coby Bassett
|
| | | | It seems to me that they (marketing) made a mistake by switching the cards between Luke and the Emperor. The throneroom scene that is behind the Palpatine fig would work well for Luke because that's where the final showdown occured between him and (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) Nevertheless, they could mix in a SW enthusiast in the marketing team. These kind of errors really annoy me - just like last night - I'm watching a PBS special that displays a graphical map with Alexandria, Egypt about as far west as Morocco, (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
