Subject:
|
Re: What a bunch of minifigs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:07:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
325 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, David Eaton writes:
>
> Hmm... these are tough to count... Does anyone else actually consider any of
> these actual figs? I'm almost tempted to count Battle Droids, Astromechs, and
> Sebulba as figs, but then again, they're not really "pure" figs... I don't
> think I include the Droid Fighter, the Pit droids, Gasgano, Sith Spies, Han
> Solo in Carb, or the Boxy thing as very plausible though... still kind of a
> tough call for me...
>
> DaveE
I definitely count Droids as actual figs, because they all have personalities,
it would seem. (Ok, things become a bit complicated when we consider "bad"
droids such as Battle Droids and those in the service of the Empire [which we
have not yet seen.] Some Battle droids have definite personalities - the
commaders, for instance. Since we'll probably never have an army of droids
(without buying an insane number of multiple sets, I think that it's reasonable
to count each Battle Droid as an actual fig, although we only have 1 unique fig
that is a battle droid so far.)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What a bunch of minifigs
|
| (...) Hmm... you seem to include sets from 1999 and 2000, yet you're looking for a 1 year period? You don't include sets that haven't been released yet, so do you mean stuff that was *technically* available throughout a 1 year period, being Jan 1, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
