 | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —John VanZwieten
|
| | | Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:MfgyOO73MuKqnmJ...4ax.com... (...) Get ready for more cynicism on this one. We haven't seen Chewie or 3PO in any logos or catalogs, and I'd be really suprised if we got 4 or even 3 unique (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | (...) I agree for the most part. I think Han w/vest and Leia are definites only because we have seen the figs and this is the only set that makes sense for them. That probably means another Luke (probably desert Luke). I would not be suprised if (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Jamie Hickey
|
| | | | | (...) and hands, painted face with maybe a pieces of brown female hair on top! And to make taller then the average minifig do the samething as I did with Vader! Put some brown 1x1 square plates on his feet! With Vader you use black 1x1 plates on the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | | (...) legs (...) to (...) How about a new Chewie helmet, black 'fig under a ghostlike cover that only covers the torso. I'm betting on something like this. Either that or a whole new head a la Jar-Jar. As for size- TLG (LC) (TLC) doesn't seem to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) And if they wanted to add another minifig then it would be an obi-wan kenobi. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | (...) be (...) Actually I would doubt it. Only because Obi-Wan and Princess Leia were never actually on the Falcon together. Now that does not mean that LEGO could not make that mistake but I doubt Lucas Film would allow such a mistake. I am (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) My guess then would be for the han and leia we have already seen and then luke and r2.just to flesh out the sets. I havew a fieling that there won't be a chewie or a 3po. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8? —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | (...) Yep. Leia w/ hair buns could pretty much be in the MF, the Tantive IV/blockade runner, or a Death Star playset. (...) Because we need plenty of R2 units. God knows I don't have enough. Maybe I can give them to all my witches as lab (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
