 | | Re: SW set list for 2000 —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) Oh my god let me just take this moment to say: the Timothy Zahn Star Wars novels were some of the worst writing I've ever seen. Plot twists you could see coming from, um, parsecs away. And about every other person is described as having (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: SW set list for 2000 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Agreed. He HAS done better work, but even his best is merely airplane fodder rather than "wow, that changed how I think about X" stuff. (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: SW set list for 2000 —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | | (...) of (...) was (...) I tend to agree as well for all the Star Wars books. I have read nearly all of them and none has been great there were a few that were good but that is the best it gets. I think the biggest problem is that even the Star Wars (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: SW set list for 2000 —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) of (...) was (...) I didn't mind them, but then, I wasn't looking for high liturature. ;) My biggest nit with his SW books was the bad guy was omniscient until book three, at which point he start being stupid. Dropped me right out the bottom (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: SW set list for 2000 —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Hear, hear. I started reading one when I was a lab assitant on a quiet day, and about fifty pages into the book, I realized that I had more fun being bored. (...) Uh, shouldn't that be: "plot twists you could see coming within the next fifteen (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
