 | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Jonathan Little
|
| | | (...) Personally, I don't like the idea at all. I, for one, liked Titanic, very much . . .except for Leo. I thought they could have gotten someone else to play the part, much better. If I were the casting director, I would've gone for somebody with (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) Ha! Actually, that was the one thing *I* didn't like about Titanic... though all the characters were fairly two-dimensional, Billy Zane may as well have turned to the camera every time he entered a scene and said, "Hi, folks. I just want to (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Jonathan Little
|
| | | | | | (...) Well . . . they could've handled Zane's character a bit better, but I was talking about the other "bad" guys that weren't as obvious, namely the entie upper deck, her mother, all her friends. As far as DV being mostly mechanical by the time (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) There's another thing in his favour -- family resemblance to another whiny Skywalker. Steve (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Richard Dee
|
| | | | Once upon a time, (on Sun, 6 Jun 1999 07:23:21 GMT, to be precise!), Jonathan uttered the following profundities.... (...) "..mostly machine now."-OB1. Which leads to the following question: Does he become less powerful with the force, as there are (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Maybe so. Perhaps that was a factor in Luke ultimately being stronger. And the idea of the midichlorians is not totally bad. As I remember it, they themselves aren't the force, they only allow their host to interpret or interact with the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Richard Dee
|
| | | | Once upon a time, (on Mon, 7 Jun 1999 06:12:13 GMT, to be precise!), Terry K uttered the following profundities.... (...) A valid point. Along the lines of they being essential to all life was what I had trouble with. The film, the book by Terry (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) they (...) Paradoxically, if they *are* lifeforms (micro-organisms), how can they be "essential" to *all* life? Wouldn't they also, then, need themselves? Jeff (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Eric Lind
|
| | | | (...) Oh, sure, trot out some recursive definition for them ;-) They probably feed on phytoplankton or twinkies or something. Or, they could be made of ABS plastic and are not, technically, alive. I want an official LEGO midichlorian! (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry, I can't help it! I'm a sucker for a paradox! I also see a pair of docs, but that's just for my state of mental health. (1) ;) Jeff 1 - Not really, I just had get my pun-for-the-day in. :) (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Kevin Bane
|
| | | | Eric Lind <ejlind@brain.uccs.edu> wrote in message news:FD0LvL.55v@lugnet.com... (...) Geez, what the heck do you think holds them together? Friction? Sheesh! ;) Kevin B aka Battlehammer (25 years ago, 9-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adding fuel to the fire —Kevin Bane
|
| | | | Kevin B <kevinb01@netfocus.net> wrote in message news:FD1D7M.EFC@lugnet.com... (...) At one point in TESB, didn't Yoda say "It surrounds us. Binds ABS. Holds them together."? Kevin B aka Battlehammer (25 years ago, 9-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
