 | | Re: rights to SW pieces —Kevin Bane
|
| | | Jonathan <piano254@aol.com> wrote in message news:FCoC6r.DIo@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) lego (...) released in (...) it (...) idea (...) bricks, (...) front (...) sure if (...) "All Star Wars elements are property of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or Lucas (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: rights to SW pieces —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | (...) I believe that in this usage, "elements" is legalese meaning "Star Wars trademark and copyright related properties", not Lego Pieces. This would include all character and object names, character depictions, symbols and logos, and like (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: rights to SW pieces —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm fascinated by this line of speculation. One thing to think about: there are prints/molds TLG *can't* use for non-SW stuff, there are prints/molds TLG *has/will* use for non-SW stuff, and then there are prints/molds TLG *could* use, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: rights to SW pieces —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) I was always under the impression that 'Star Wars elements' would mean such things as the logo, names and possibly the clothing designs. An element is not neccasarily a physical object, merely an idea or design. If you look more carefully you (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
