To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 17026
17025  |  17027
Subject: 
Re: The RE_wing. A recon version of the E-Wing fighter
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:29:49 GMT
Viewed: 
220 times
  
In lugnet.announce.moc, brent skadan wrote:
  
snip

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/brentlymills/XE-Wing/re-wing_flight_side.jpg



Well I hope you all like it!

Questions, comments?

BTW: it is not 100% complete, there are still some finishing touches to do. Though, since I will not have any time to work on it for the next few months I figured I had better post it before something horrible happens -- like my cat trying to play with it.

Brent

From a technical/construction perspective I really like the model. I really like how you were able to make all the angles mate-up cleanly as well as the ablilty to skin the entire model in tiles. I also like how you implemented the cockpit windows. I’ve seen you other models on brick shelf and I really like how you are able to use creative SNOT construction to achieve the shape you want.

I guess I’m not really a fan of the e-wing in general. The side view of the ship seems really tall and blocky... where as the top view looks really good. Maybe this particular shape does not translate well to the 2-d medium of pictures and would look much better in person.

Tiling-over the model’s entire surface is cool, it also detracts alot from the ship’s visual appearence. This is mainly due to the large gaps between tiles. The other side effect is that the tile pieces look too small to be believable skin pannels for the scale you are building at. It really breaks up the sleakness of the shape (especially in the large slab-sided profile shots). Unfortunately there is not much you can do about this since it is an artifact of the tile piece’s design/molding accuracy. If there were a 4x4 tile piece that you could use in place of 4 of the 2x2 parts, I think it would look alot better due to the reduced number of tile gaps and a more believable pannel size. The only thing I could think of that you could actually do is use a darker color. The tile gaps are not as apparent on the blue portions as they are on the light gray portions. Another option would be to try to build it at minifig scale rather than technic scale.

The only other criticism I have is that the engines look too small for the size of the model and they kinda have that last-minute-tacked-on feel to them. I know you said the model is not 100% finished; so maybe that is something you were planning to put more work into?? The tiny round engine pods seem to clash with the large slab-sided nature of the rest of the design.

Hope you don’t mind a few points of constructive criticism. Overall, it is a very impressive model.

drc



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The RE_wing. A recon version of the E-Wing fighter
 
Thank you for your comments. I agree with you on the tile aspect - I wish Lego did make larger tiles. The only ones I know of are from their Scalia series and they only come in lime green and orange (as well as being very hard to find). I also, (...) (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  The RE_wing. A recon version of the E-Wing fighter
 
Those crazy engineers at FreiTek have come up with a heavily modified scout version of the E-Wing fighter, the RE-Wing. It measures in at 12 meters long (using 6 studs = 1 meter) with a wing span of 9 meters. It has two custom heavy thrust fusion (...) (20 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, FTX) ! 

15 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR