Subject:
|
Re: 7130 What's the Deal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:17:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
886 times
|
| |
|
|
"Matt Hein" <Pyrokid17@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Guzv5D.IqK@lugnet.com...
> On the contrary, sets such as the gungan sub *looked*
> more like a random collection of specialized parts
> thrown together to *attempt* a star wars set. Heck,
> it couldn't sustain itself under water. Talk about
> a cheap sub!
What specialized parts are you talking about in the Gungan Sub? The clam?
The Starfish? That thing was crammed with very normal, very useful parts.
> Yeah, finally a star wars set that actually
> appealed to me. When I saw other models such as
> the gungan sub, or the naboo fighter, I wasn't
> really interested. The 7130 really changed my
> opinion of the Star Wars line.
Thats odd. The Snowspeeder came *before* the Episode 1 sets by several
months. How could the Snowspeeder change your opinion of the SW line if it
was released before the other sets you mention? Did you not see any of the
original trilogy sets until the summer of '99 or something? But i'm not
disputing you about 7130, it is one of the best sets period.
<snip>
Not trying to pick on you, just wondering if you have some of your facts
straight.
-Jon
--
| The Shipyard - http://zemi.net/shipyard
| My Lego Creations - http://zemi.net/lego
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 7130 What's the Deal?
|
| (...) I have a 7130, and it's among one of the few sets I've kept in one piece. Perhaps it's just the notion that it's star wars, and it has an excellent design, that I kept the original model still built in the box. I still proudly display it on my (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
